To address this problem, I’ve blended a three-minute visual demonstration on why and how to use a bibliographic management tool into my broader presentations on the research-to-writing process. This mismatch between the high value we place on writing, and the limited ways we teach about the process, never ceases to amaze me. Why not? Probably because it’s still uncommon for scholars to openly teach, share, and learn ways of composing our written works, despite the fact that it’s the primary way we evaluate the quality of our students and faculty. And when I talk further with the half who use these tools, many confide that they still don’t fully understand how to effectively utilize them. Every time I teach a class or give a guest lecture about the research-to-writing process, I pose this question: Do you currently use a bibliography management tool to keep track of books and articles you’ve read, so that you can easily cite them in your writing? While of my undergraduates have never used these tools, I continue to be surprised by gatherings of graduate students in reading-intensive fields, such as history, where only half of the audience raise their hands. You'll always want to double-check against the style handbook/manual and any additional guidance your professor has given you.Yesterday it happened again. This is especially useful for pharmacy resources.
This way when you use cite this source, you'll see the correct citation (or what Zotero considers the title) - since it's the only information included.
0 kommentar(er)
